THE EFFECTIVENESS USING PICTURE AND CARD MEDIA IN TEACHING ENGLISHTO INCREASE STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY AT ELEVENTH GRADE AT SMAN 3 TOLITOLI
Abstract
This research aimed to find out whether picture and card media are effective and to compare which media is more effective to increase students’ vocabulary. This research is true-experimental research design. The samples were 10 students at class VIII IIS 1 and class VIII IIS 2 which selected randomly. Data collected through giving pre-test and post-test. The pre-test conducted to measure the students’ knowledge before giving the treatment, whereas the post-test accomplished to evaluate and to measure their ability and knowledge after giving the treatment. Those data analyzed statistically. In the card media group, the mean score of post-test is 75,04 was higher than pre-test 48,12 and the mean score of post-test in picture group is 84,84 was higher than pre-test 38,76. The t-counted value is higher than the t-table. f =7,529 > = 2,306 It means that the hypothesis of the research is accepted. In other words, using picture and card media in teaching English is effective to increase students’ vocabulary. Based on the result of pre-test and post-test in two media, it can be concluded that the picture media is more effective than card media in teaching English to increase students’ vocabulary especially on verb.
References
Arikunto, Suharsimi.(2010).Prosedur Penelitian Pendekatan Praktik.Jakarta: PT.Renika Cipta
Arikunto, Suharsimi.(2013).Prosedur Penelitian Pendekatan Praktik.Jakarta: PT.Renika Cipta
Brown, Douglas,2007. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching.San Fransisco: Pearson Longman.
Creswell, John.2012. Educational Research Planning, Conducting And Evaluating Quantitative And Qualitative Research. Boston: Pearson
Dulay, Heidi., Burt, Marina. And Krashen, Stephen. (1982). Language Two. New York: Oxford University Press.
Emilia, E. (2008). Menulis Tesis dan Disertasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Husna, L., Zainil., & Rozimela, Y. (2013). An Analysis of Students’ Writing Skill inDescriptive Text at Grade X1 IPA 1 of MAN 2 Padang. Journal English Language Teaching (ELT), 1 (2), 5-6.
James, Carl.(2013). Errors in Language Learning and Use. New York and London: Routledge.
Muis, Ihda Atira. (2019). An Error Analysis of Using Present Tense by The Tenth Grade Students of Senior High School In Writing Descriptive Text At MAN 2 Model Medan. Medan.UIN Sumatra Utara. (unpublis).
Noprianto, E. (2017). Students’ Descriptive Text Writing in SFL Perspectives. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 2 (1), 66-67
Nunan, David.2005.Practical English Language Teaching: Young Learners.New York:Mc Graw-Hill
Nurjanah, Siti. (2017). The Analysis of Students’ Error in Using Simple Present Tense in Students’ Writing Descriptive Text at The Eighth Grade Students of SMP N 12 Purworejo in The Academic Year of 2016/2017. Purworejo. Universitas Muhammadia Purworejo.(unpublish)
Richards, Jack C. and Schmidt, Richard. (2010). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Great Britain:Pearson Education Limited.
Rohmah, Laela Hayati.(2016). An Error Analysis of Using Simple Present Tense in Descriptive Text Written by The Tenth Grade Students Of MAN 1 Surakarta Academic Year 2015/2016. Surakarta. IAIN Surakarta. (unpublish)
Rosa, R. N., Muryanti, E.,Mulia, D.,& Jaya, I. (2008).English For General Purpose: ACourse for University Students. Padang: Sukabina Offset.
Sugiono.(2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Kuantitatif, Kualitative, dan R&D.Bandung:Alfabeta
Strauss and Corbin, 2015. Basic of Qualitative Research Fourth Edition. London: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Sudarwati, Th.M., &Graca, E. (2007).Look A Head An English Course 1; for Senior HighSchool Students Year X. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Widoyoko, Eko Putro.(2012). Teknik Penyusunan Instrument Penelitian. Semarang: Pustaka Belajar.
Wijaya, Mahendra Aris. (2015). An Error Analysis on The Use Simple Present Tense in A Descriptive Text Written By The Seventh Grade Students of SMPN 5 Kediri in Academic Year 2014/201. Kediri. University of Nusantara PGRI Kediri. (unpublish)
