THE COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN JIGSAW TECHNIQUE AND STUDENTS TEAM ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING SKILL AT EIGHT GRADE OF SMP N 4 TOLITOLI
Abstract
The objective of the research was to compare the effectiveness jigsaw and STAD at the eight grade  of  SMPN 4  Tolitoli. It was true experimental research. It was conducted at the eight grade of  SMPN 4 Tolitoli. The researcher gave a pre-test to measure the students previous reading skill. Then, a post test was to find out the students reading skill after giving treatment which used jigsaw technique and STAD. The researcher used SPSS 21 program to analyze the data collection. The result of the data analysis showed that the average score of VIII C (Jigsaw class) was for the 51,472 pre- test and 81,904 for the post-test. The average score of VIII A (STAD class) was 53,412 for the pre-test and 80,364 for the post-test. Jigsaw technique and STAD was effective to improve students’ reading skill at the eight grade of SMPN 4 Tolitoli. Although, both of the  technique could  improve students’  reading  skill  but  the  obtained score  of  t-test showed that t-score -0,646 was lower than t-table 2,011. It meant that Ho was accepted and Ha was rejected. Since, the tc was lower than tt, there was no significance difference in the achievement students in class VIII C who were tought mind Jigsaw technique and students in class VIII A who were taught STAD. Key words: Comparative, Jigsaw technique, STAD, Reading skillÂ
References
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Prosedur penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Aronson Elliot, 2006. The Jigsaw Classroom, Web Site Copyright 2000-2006, Collins, 2006. Advanced learner’s dictionary fifth edition. Glasgow: William Collins.
Burhan, B., & Saugadi, S. (2017). Peranan Guru Terhadap Mutu Pendidikan. Visipena Journal, 8(1)
Darwis, A. (2020). IMPROVING SOCIAL SCIENCE LEARNING OUTCOMES BY USING THE LEARNING MODEL THINK PAIR SHARE VIIB CLASS STUDENTS SMP 4 TOLITOLI. Jurnal Madako Education, 6(1).
Farris, Pamela J, Fuhler, Carol J, Walther, Maria P. 2004. Teaching Reading “A B alanced Approach for Today Classrooms. MC Graw Hiil
Hidayatullah, 2007. The effectiveness of Using Spalding Method in Increasing Students’ Reading Comprehension of the Second Year Students’ of SMA DDI Sibatua Pangke. Thesis UIN Alaudin Makassar.
Irwan. 2005. The Application of Skimming and Scanning in Teaching Reading to the Third Year Students’ of SLTPN 1 Mario Riawa Kab. Soppeng. Thesis. IAAN Alaudin Makassar.
Jacub, T. A., Marto, H., & Darwis, A. (2020). MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DALAM PENINGKATAN HASIL BELAJAR IPS (STUDI PENELITIAN TINDAKAN KELAS DI SMP NEGERI 2 TOLITOLI). Tolis Ilmiah: Jurnal Penelitian, 2(2).
Longman Group UK Limited. 1992. Dictionary of English Language and Culture. England: Longman Group UK Limited
Malik, A. R., & Asnur, M. N. A. (2019). USING SOCIAL MEDIA AS A LEARNING MEDIA OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE STUDENTS IN HIGHER EDUCATION. Bahtera: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 18(2), 166-75.
Malik, A. R., Emzir, E., & Sumarni, S. (2020). PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN MOBILE LEARNING DAN GAYA BELAJAR VISUAL TERHADAP PENGUASAAN KOSAKATA BAHASA JERMAN SISWA SMA NEGERI 1 MAROS. Visipena, 11(1), 194-207.
Malik, A. R. (2019, August). THE INFLUENCE OF INSTAGRAM AND AUDITORY LEARNING STYLE ON GERMAN LANGUAGE MASTERY IN STUDENTS OF SMAN 1 MAROS. In International Conference on Cultural Studies (Vol. 2, pp. 279-283).
Malik, A. R., & Fatimah, S. (2017). ANALISIS KESALAHAN MORFOLOGI DALAM KARANGAN SEDERHANA BAHASA JERMAN SISWA KELAS XI SMAN 2 MAKASSAR. Eralingua: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Asing dan Sastra, 1(1).
Slavin, Robert E. 1995. Cooperative Learning Theory , Research, and Practice
Second Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Company Social Psycology Network. http://www.jigsaw.org
Spartt, M., Pulverness, A. And Williams, M. 2005. The TKT Course: Teaching
Knowledge Test. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta
Wael, A., Asnur, M. N. A., & Ibrahim, I. (2018). EXPLORING STUDENTS’LEARNING STRATEGIES IN SPEAKING PERFORMANCE. International Journal of Language Education, 2(1), 65 71.
