Publication Ethics
ANALOGY: Journal of Architecture, Built Environment &; Planology is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Faculty of Engineering, Architecture Study Program, Madako Tolitoli University. The journal is available in print and online form and highly upholds publication ethics and avoids any kind of plagiarism. This statement describes the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing articles in this journal, including authors, editors-in-chief, editorial board, peer-reviewers and publishers (Department of Earth Science and Technology). This statement is based on COPE Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Journal Publication Ethics Guidelines. The publication of an article in the peer-reviewed journal ANALOGI is an important building block in the development of a coherent and respected knowledge network. This is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree on standards of ethical behavior that are expected for all parties involved in the act of publishing: authors, journal editors, peer reviewers, publishers and the public.
The Faculty of Engineering, Architecture Study Program as the publisher of ANALOGI takes the guardianship duties over all stages of publishing seriously and we recognize ethical behavior and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprints, or other commercial revenue does not impact or influence editorial decisions. The Faculty of Engineering, Architecture Study Program and the Editorial Board will assist in communication with other journals and/or publishers if this is useful and necessary.
Publication Decision. ANALOGI Editor: Journal of Architecture, Built Environment & Planning is responsible for deciding which articles are submitted to the journal that should be published. The validation of such work and its importance to researchers and readers should always drive such decisions. Editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and limited by applicable legal requirements regarding defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Editors can work with other editors or reviewers in making these decisions.
Fair Play. Editors at all times evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content regardless of the author's race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy.
Concealment. Any editor and editorial staff should not disclose any information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than appropriate authors, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisors, and publishers, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflict of interest. Unpublished material disclosed in the submitted manuscript should not be used in the editor's own research without the written consent of the author.
Editor's Duties
Editors are responsible for deciding which articles are submitted to journals that should be published. The validation of such work and its importance to researchers and readers should always drive such decisions. Editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and limited by applicable legal requirements regarding defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair play. Editors at all times evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content regardless of the author's race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy.
Concealment. Any editor and editorial staff should not disclose any information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than appropriate authors, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisors, and publishers, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflict of interest. Unpublished material disclosed in the submitted manuscript should not be used in the editor's own research without the written consent of the author.
Reviewer Duties
Contribution to Editorial Decisions. Peer review helps editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with writers can also help writers in improving articles
Speed. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review research reported in a manuscript or knows that a quick review is impossible should notify the editor and withdraw from the review process.
Concealment. Any manuscript accepted for review should be treated as a confidential document. They should not be shown or discussed with others except as permitted by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity. The review should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees must express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgment of sources. Reviewers should identify relevant published works that have not been cited by the author. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument has been previously reported must be accompanied by a relevant citation. Reviewers should also call the editor's attention if there are substantial similarities or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and other published articles of which they are personally aware.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review should be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest resulting from competition, cooperation, or other relationships or relationships with the author, company, or any institution associated with the paper.
Author's Duties
Reporting standards. The author of the original research report should present an accurate account of the work done as well as an objective discussion of its significance. The underlying data must be accurately presented in the newspaper. The paper should contain enough detail and references to allow others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or deliberately inaccurate statements constitute unethical and unacceptable behavior.
Data Access and Retention. Authors are required to provide raw data with respect to the article for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), where possible, and in any case should be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
Originality and Plagiarism. Authors should ensure that they have written a completely original work, and if the author has used someone else's work and/or words that it has been appropriately cited or cited.
Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publications. An author should not generally publish a manuscript describing essentially the same research in more than one major journal or publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously is unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior.
Acknowledgment of sources. Proper recognition of the work of others should always be given. Authors should cite publications that are influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Paper Writing. Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All people who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in a particular substantive aspect of the research project, they should be recognized or listed as contributors. Correspondence authors must ensure that all appropriate co-authors and that no co-authors are inappropriately included in the article, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have consented to its submission for publication.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest. All authors must disclose in their manuscripts any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that may be construed to affect the outcome or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project must be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works. When an author finds significant errors or inaccuracies in his published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
=====================
Moh. Mudassir Ali, S.T., M.PW., IAI
Editor-in-Chief,
ANALOGY : Journal of Architecture, Built Environment &; Planning
