Inda Indrawati, Indah ariyanti hanapi


The purpose of this study is to find out how a teacher provides feedback to students on descriptive text learning and to determine student responses to teacher feedback. The design in this study used descriptive qualitative research. The subjects in this study were one English teacher and twenty-seven students. The research instrument uses a questionnaire, interviews and documentation. Data analysis in this study is a qualitative analysis with three stages, namely data reduction, data presentation and conclusion drawing/verification. The results of the study based on interviews and questionnaires as supporting the results of the study showed that the English teacher gave direct feedback, namely the teacher gave explanations and questions during the learning process and indirect feedback, namely the teacher gave assignments from the conclusions at the end of learning to students in descriptive text learning. Student responses to teacher feedback in descriptive text learning are quite good by asking, answering and doing the tasks given by the teacher.

Full Text:



Arsyad. Azhar Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada. cetekan

ke-20. 2017.

Bijami, M., Kashef, S. H., & Nejad, M. S. (2013). Peer feedback in learning English writing: Advantages and disadvantages.Journal of Studies in Education, 3(4), 91-97.

Ermawati, E. 2012. Teacher’s Feedback on Students’ Descriptive Text Writing and Students’ Attitude toward the Feedback in Class 8A At SMPN 3 Kencong Jember in the 2011/2012 Academic Year. Unpublished S1 Thesis: Jember University.

Hedge, dkk. (1998). Umpan Balik Guru untuk Siswa dalam Pelajaran Berhitung: Are Siswa Mendapat Nilai Baik?

Humer, Jeremy. (2007). The Practice of Language Teaching. U.K: Pearson Education Limited.

Humer, Jeremy. (2007). How to Teach English. China: Pearson Education Limited.

Izan, Ahmad (2009). Membagun Guru Berkarakter. Bandung: Imperial Bakti Utama.

Lewis, M. (2002). Giving Feedback In Language Classes. SEAMEO Regional Pusat Bahasa.

Moleong, Lexy J. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya Offset. Cet. Ke-35. 2013.

Mukhtar (2013). Metode Praktis Penelitian Deskriptif Kualitatif. Ciputat: Referensi GP PressGroup

Nafisah, N., and Kurniawan, E. 2007. Writing for General Communication. Bandung. UPI Press.

Nugrahani, Alifiyanti and Fernando. 2006. Language to use English. Jakarta: Pirenti Darma Kolakatama.

Nunan, David. 2003. Practical English Language Teaching. New York: Mc Craw Hill.

Pertiwi, Indri Eka. 2013. Teacher’s feedback on students’ descriptive text: A Case Study Conducted in A Junior Hiigh School in Bandung. Pendidikan Indonesia University.

Purnawarman, Pupung. (2011). Impacts of teacher feedback on ESL/EFL Students’ Writing: Impact of Different Types of Teacher Corrective Feedback in Reducing Grammatical Errors on ESL/EFL Students’ Writing. Disertation to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University: unpublished.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Sulistianingsih, Dwi Elis. 2017. A Teacher’s Written feedback on students’ Writing: A Descriptive Study at on Public Junior High School in Bandung. Pendidikan Indonesia University.

Rüütmann, T., & Kipper, H. (2011, September). Teaching strategies for direct and indirect instruction in teaching engineering. In 2011 14th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (pp. 107-114). IEEE.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Madako Education is indexed by